Legal Opinion

Pinell v. Roppo

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1925No. 19056. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

This is an action for contribution for loss sustained on a contract to purchase mining stock. It appears from the evidence that plaintiff, Pinell, defendant Boppo, and one E. Sholz, on January 31,1922, signed a subscription to purchase $6,000 worth of stock of the Sound Oil Company. All o'f the parties at the time had great visions of money to be made in this venture ; Pinell especially being assisted in his belief by the advice of a fortune teller in a nearby city. However, shortly after signing the agreement, Sholz and Boppo became dissatisfied with the deal, and Boppo testified that they…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Clark v. NeeseMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Crary v. CoffinWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API