Legal Opinion

Pfeiffer v. Crossley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 5, 1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On case certified from the Essex Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The essential facts established at the trial are that contemporaneously with the assignment of a bond and mortgage of $5,700, by defendant to plaintiff, and as a part consideration of the transaction and an inducement to plaintiff-to accept the bond and mortgage, defendant executed and delivered a written guarantee to plaintiff, set forth, in full below, whereby he guaranteed “the payment of the face of the said mortgage.” Afterwards, Ihe mortgage not being paid, Orossloy’s attention was evidently called to the fact and at his request…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newark Finance Corp. v. AcocellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. The Bank of New Jersey, a Banking Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Aaron HeineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Developers Small Business Investment Corp. v. HoeckleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Langeveld v. LRZH CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. United States Rubber Co. v. Champs Tires, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API