Pfeiffer v. Crossley
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On case certified from the Essex Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The essential facts established at the trial are that contemporaneously with the assignment of a bond and mortgage of $5,700, by defendant to plaintiff, and as a part consideration of the transaction and an inducement to plaintiff-to accept the bond and mortgage, defendant executed and delivered a written guarantee to plaintiff, set forth, in full below, whereby he guaranteed “the payment of the face of the said mortgage.” Afterwards, Ihe mortgage not being paid, Orossloy’s attention was evidently called to the fact and at his request…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Newark Finance Corp. v. AcocellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- The Bank of New Jersey, a Banking Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Aaron HeineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Developers Small Business Investment Corp. v. HoeckleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Langeveld v. LRZH CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- United States Rubber Co. v. Champs Tires, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.