Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLANCY, District Judge.

This is an action against the United • States based upon refund claims to recover taxes paid for the fiscal year ending May 31, 1929. There are two causes of action. In the first cause of action the plaintiff seeks to recover $54,962.37 and interest upon the ground that its income was improperly taxed as that of an association, whereas it should have been taxed as income of a trust. In the second cáuse of action plaintiff seeks the recovery of $8,-279.63 and interest because of an alleged overpayment of income tax for the same fiscal year. The two causes of action will…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Morrissey v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koenig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Denmark Cheese Ass'n v. Hazard Advertising Co.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. (PS) Sonia v. Losrios Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PS) Zamanieh Shahri v. Losrios Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Cribier v. Compass, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API