Bishop v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. McAULIFFE, Judge, Retired, Specially Assigned.
This case involves the question of whether a juror’s response to a poll of a verdict in a criminal case was ambiguous, and if so, whether the trial judge’s action properly resolved the ambiguity.
I
Paul Renard Bishop was tried in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County on charges of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. At the conclusion of deliberations following a two-day trial, the foreman of the jury announced a verdict of guilty on both counts. Defense counsel requested that the jury be polled. The first two jurors answered “yes, it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lattisaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Alford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.