Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 22, 1996No. 81, Sept. Term, 1994PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN F. McAULIFFE, Judge, Retired, Specially Assigned.

This case involves the question of whether a juror’s response to a poll of a verdict in a criminal case was ambiguous, and if so, whether the trial judge’s action properly resolved the ambiguity.

I

Paul Renard Bishop was tried in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County on charges of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. At the conclusion of deliberations following a two-day trial, the foreman of the jury announced a verdict of guilty on both counts. Defense counsel requested that the jury be polled. The first two jurors answered “yes, it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lattisaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Alford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API