Legal Opinion
Rivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided January 11, 2017No. Civil No. 13-1889 (SEC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, U.S. Senior District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because the elements necessary to support Plain*121tiffs claims are supported only with inadmissible hearsay and conelusory allegations included in her affidavit, the motion is granted.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
At forty-six years of age, Martina Rivera started working for Medina & Medina, Inc. (Defendant or Medina). Rivera’s tenure began in 2006 and she received salary increases in 2008, 2009, and 2013. Every year, except for the year she resigned, Rivera…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Ramos v. Toperbee Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
- Vargas-Medina v. Ortho Biologics, LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017