Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Toperbee Corp.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 13, 2017No. Civil No. 15-1462 (CVR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CAMILLE L. VELEZ RIVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

INTRODUCTION

The present cause of action arises after co-Defendant Toperbee Corporation (“To-*311perbee”) and Luxottica (operating under the name “Pearle Vision”) entered into an asset purchasing agreement whereby To-perbee acquired the Pearle Vision store located in San Patricio Plaza Mall, together with several assets, from Luxottica. To-perbee operates several franchises of Pearle Vision stores in Puerto Rico, and provides eye care services, including contact lenses, treatments' and products for eye care, and designer eyewear…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erazo-Vazquez v. State Industrial Products CorporationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
  2. Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
  3. Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
  4. Morey v. McDonald's USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Palomino-Alonso v. StoneMor Puerto Rico LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API