Ramos v. Toperbee Corp.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CAMILLE L. VELEZ RIVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
INTRODUCTION
The present cause of action arises after co-Defendant Toperbee Corporation (“To-*311perbee”) and Luxottica (operating under the name “Pearle Vision”) entered into an asset purchasing agreement whereby To-perbee acquired the Pearle Vision store located in San Patricio Plaza Mall, together with several assets, from Luxottica. To-perbee operates several franchises of Pearle Vision stores in Puerto Rico, and provides eye care services, including contact lenses, treatments' and products for eye care, and designer eyewear…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Erazo-Vazquez v. State Industrial Products CorporationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
- Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Morey v. McDonald's USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Palomino-Alonso v. StoneMor Puerto Rico LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021