Legal Opinion

Louis Stuart, Vivian Stuart and Rechel Stuart v. United States of America and Alson E. Lancaster, Special Agent, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1969No. 27093PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge:

A summons, comparable to a subpoena duces tecum, was issued by the Internal Revenue Service, compelling appellant-taxpayers’ accountant, John B. Blois, to produce certain of their records in his possession. Blois resisted and the Service petitioned the court below for enforcement. Appellants were granted leave to intervene, under Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Intervention of Right”). From the order of the District Court enforcing the summons, they appeal.

In February 1968, Revenue Agent Alma Vaughn was assigned by the Service to conduct a civil investigation…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. RoundtreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Horton R. PruddenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Leslie B. Ponder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API