Legal Opinion

National Security Fire & Casualty Co. v. Vintson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 6, 1984No. 82-586PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

Appeal by defendants; National Security Fire & Casualty Company (National Security) and William Feazell, from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict. The action involved coverage under a fire insurance policy and was brought by plaintiffs, James Vintson, Emma Vintson, and Cavalier Insurance Company (Cavalier). We reverse and remand.

*943Plaintiff James Vintson originally filed suit in the Circuit Court of Calhoun County on July 17, 1980. Vintson’s complaint, as finally amended, contained three counts: (1)breach of an oral contract for fire insurance; (2) fraud and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. National Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss. v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. LavoieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Surrency v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. T.D.S. Incorporated v. Shelby Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API