Legal Opinion

Tanner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1952No. 34206PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. “In a trial for assault with intent to murder, the question of intent is for the jury. Gilbert v. State, 90 Ga. 691 (16 S. E. 652); Walton v. State, 114 Ga. 112 (39 S. E. 877); Hunter v. State, 10 Ga. App. 831 (74 S. E. 553); Wimberly v. State, 12 Ga. App. 540 (77 S. E. 879); Chandler v. State, 54 Ga. App. 334 (4) (187 S. E. 856). While to authorize a conviction for assault with intent to murder, a deliberate intent to kill must be shown at the time of the assault, such intent may be inferred by the jury from the ‘nature of the instrument used in making the assault, the manner of its use,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Wimberly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Reece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gipson v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API