People v. Groom
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
The sole contention made by defendant in his appeal from a judgment of conviction for possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530) is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. This contention we hold to be without merit.
Subject to the right of the prosecution to introduce additional evidence the cause was submitted to the trial court on the transcript of the preliminary hearing, which contained only the testimony of Officer Madison of the Los Angeles Police Department that at approximately 4:30 a.m. on June 6, 1961, as he and Officer Allen were driving east on Sunset…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. ReismanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.