Lind v. Grimmer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY.
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Hawaii Rev.Stat. § ll-216(d) prohibits disclosure of information concerning investigations undertaken by Hawaii’s Campaign Spending Commission. The State of Hawaii appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment, which enjoined enforcement of the statute on the ground that it violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, both as applied to appellee Lind and on its face. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
When a complaint is filed with Hawaii’s Campaign Spending Commission, the Commission is required to determine whether there is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Betsy Bayless Janet Napolitano, in Her Official Capacity as the Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Monte D. Tucker v. State of California Department of Education James L. Phillips Maria R. Balakshin Terry ProscholdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- 4805 Convoy, Inc., a California Corporation v. City of San Diego, a Political Subdivision of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Aldo TaralloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Stilp v. ContinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.