Legal Opinion

Bayer Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge.

This civil action arises out of the denial of federal income tax credits for qualified research expenses claimed by-Plaintiffs, Bayer Corporation and Subsidiaries (“Bayer”), for the years 1990-2006. Before the Court is Bayer’s Amended Motion for a Case Management/Protective Order Based on Statistical Sampling (“Amended Sampling Motion”). (Docket No. 71). For the reasons set forth below, the Amended Sampling Motion will be denied.

FINDINGS OF FACT

After consideration of the testimony and evidence presented by the parties during a hearing on the Amended…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trask v. Olin Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Tell City Boatworks, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API