Legal Opinion

Ruhe v. Rowland

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 13, 1986No. 05-85-00578-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant-husband, William J. Ruhe, Jr., appeals from a judgment in favor of the appellee-wife, Elizabeth Jane Rowland, for unpaid child support. We overrule both of the husband’s two points of error and affirm.

In his first point of error, the husband contends that the trial court was in error in failing to recognize that an agreement of the parties allegedly announced in open court on October 13, 1983, was an enforceable settlement and compromise agreement regarding the issue of child support. In order to understand our disposition of this point, a brief factual background…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warren v. Taff (In Re Taff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  2. Petoske v. Petoske (In Re Petoske)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  3. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Nelson v. Mineer (In Re Mineer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  5. Parisi v. White (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Huckeby v. Lawdermilk, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1986
  3. Woodley v. BrutonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Madnick v. DoellingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Pettit v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API