Sada v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This proceeding in certiorari was instituted by petitioners Sada and Dantoni, copartners doing business as Loop Bowling Alley, to secure the annulment of an award made against them by the Industrial Accident Commission for the death of Martial Hainque.
The commission found that on March 7, 1937, Martial Hainque, while working as a pinsetter for petitioners, sustained an injury which resulted in his death on March 10th, and that Agnes M. O’Connor, the mother of decedent, was a partial dependent, entitled to a death benefit of $1560, and $150 for burial expenses. Petitioners challenge…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Bernstein v. Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Larsen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. HatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City & County of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.