Legal Opinion

Sada v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1938No. S. F. 15957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This proceeding in certiorari was instituted by petitioners Sada and Dantoni, copartners doing business as Loop Bowling Alley, to secure the annulment of an award made against them by the Industrial Accident Commission for the death of Martial Hainque.

The commission found that on March 7, 1937, Martial Hainque, while working as a pinsetter for petitioners, sustained an injury which resulted in his death on March 10th, and that Agnes M. O’Connor, the mother of decedent, was a partial dependent, entitled to a death benefit of $1560, and $150 for burial expenses. Petitioners challenge…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Larsen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. HatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API