City & County of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The main question upon this review of a decision of the Industrial Accident Commission which awarded benefits to the widow of a member of petitioner’s fire department, involves the applicability of the disputable presumption that in the case of a member of such a department “heart trouble which develops or manifests itself during the period while such member is in the service of” such department “shall be presumed to arise out of and in the course of the employment. This presumption is disputable and may be controverted by other evidence, but unless so controverted, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kershaw v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Colgan v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Ferris v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.