Legal Opinion

Ushkow v. Brodowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motions of defendants David R. Halleran, M.D., and Robert A. Bornhurst, M.D., for partial summary judgment dismissing as time-barred that part of the complaint predicated on their treatment of plaintiff’s decedent before December 8, 1992 (see, CPLR 214-a). The proof establishes that decedent’s internist, defendant Michael J. Brodowski, M.D., referred decedent to Halleran and Bornhurst for medical tests and treatment within their areas of specialty, but that neither had an agency or other “relevant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Cox v. Kingsboro Medical GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Meath v. MishrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Swartz v. KarlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adam v. Park Ridge HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Clifford v. KatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Ushkow v. BrodowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API