Legal Opinion

Shunk v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1925No. 25,794PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This action grew out of an exchange of lands. The plaintiff sued to recover a part of the purchase price paid because of a shortage in acreage, and for damages for breach of the covenant against encumbrances, the encumbrance complained of being what is called an “ice lease” with the right to pass over a part of the land to and from the river for the purpose of harvesting and marketing the ice. It was tried to a jury, which made findings of fact and returned a verdict for plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The plaintiff, William Shunk,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Wheeler v. BeemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Haggart v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Lovett v. City of Jacksonville BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Magraw v. DillowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API