Legal Opinion

Holt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 2, 1971No. 6 Div. 132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Assault: fine of $250.00, plus six months hard labor for the county. Code 1940, T. 14, § 33.

I

The first claim of error arose from the denial of a ten day continuance because an F.B.I. agent under subpoena took umbrage under an order of the Attorney General of the United States. The witness respectfully declined to testify about an investigation of certain Birmingham police officers, claimed to have breached Holt’s civil rights 1.

We find no timely motion by Holt to request that the Attorney General of the United States make provision for the production of the information. The lack…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tanner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Towns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API