Legal Opinion
Siegel v. AT & T Communications
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 14, 1993No. 91-2446PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Claimant brings this appeal from the order of the judge of compensation claims *1347awarding temporary total disability benefits from May 1, 1990, through September 18, 1990, but denying all claims for medical benefits. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse 'in part.
Claimant is a 46-year-old female who was employed by AT & T Communications when she sustained her industrial injury. At that time, she was participating in AT & T’s executive loan program with the United Way and was responsible for conducting presentations at various businesses. In doing so, she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parish v. Baptist Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Yeargin Const. Co. v. HutchinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Curtis v. Bordo Citrus ProductsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Roll v. Sebastian InletDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SenecaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacHacon v. Velda Farms DairyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- McClaney v. Dictaphone/Pitney BowesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994