Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Seneca
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Appellant, self-insured employer, seeks review of a workers’ compensation order finding claimant to be permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.
In 1980, claimant suffered a compensable back injury which resulted in a 20% permanent physical impairment of the body as a whole. Except for those periods when he was totally disabled, claimant was released to return to light-duty work commensurate with the extensive restrictions placed on his physical activities.
Claimant is sixty-two years old with two years of college and some specialized on-the-job training in the area of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SenecaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roll v. Sebastian InletDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Vann v. St. Anthony's Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Siegel v. AT & T CommunicationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993