Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Seneca

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 1987No. BP-410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Appellant, self-insured employer, seeks review of a workers’ compensation order finding claimant to be permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.

In 1980, claimant suffered a compensable back injury which resulted in a 20% permanent physical impairment of the body as a whole. Except for those periods when he was totally disabled, claimant was released to return to light-duty work commensurate with the extensive restrictions placed on his physical activities.

Claimant is sixty-two years old with two years of college and some specialized on-the-job training in the area of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SenecaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roll v. Sebastian InletDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Vann v. St. Anthony's Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Siegel v. AT & T CommunicationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API