Legal Opinion
State v. Blanco
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 16, 2000No. 98-3153-CR, 98-3535-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
¶ 1. Antonio V. Blanco and Nora M. Al-Shammari appeal from judgments entered after both pled guilty to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, marijuana, greater than 2,500 grams, as a party to a crime, contrary to WlS. STAT. §§ 961.14(4)(t), 961.41(lm)(h)3, 939.63 and *398939.05 (1997-98).1 Blanco and Al-Shammari claim that the trial court erred when it denied their motions seeking to suppress evidence. Each argues that the arrest warrant held by police did not give them proper authority to enter Al-Shammari's apartment and that, once the police had entered, the protective…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Phillip LauterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- State v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. Steven T. DelapWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.