United States v. Castro
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOWARD F. SACHS, District Judge.
After review of the record, and noting that there were no objections filed, the report and recommendation (Doc. 59) is hereby adopted, and the motion to suppress (Doc. 28) is hereby GRANTED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JOHN T. MAUGHMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. # 28) filed on February 8, 2013, by defendant Ricardo Varela Castro (“Castro”). On April 10, 2013 and on April 16, 2013, the undersigned held a two-day evidentiary hearing on Castro’s motion. Castro was present and represented by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.