Croll v. Miller
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
When a proper application of the principles of law announced by our Supreme Court in Lente v. Luci, 275 Pa. 217, 119 A. 132, and repeated and illustrated by this court in the recent cases of. Rednock v. Westmoreland Coal Co., 132 Pa. Superior Ct. 89, 94-96, 200 A. 114, and Casper v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 132 Pa. Superior Ct. 96, 102-107, 200 A. 186, is made to the facts found by the referee and adopted by the board in this workmen’s compensation case, it is apparent that the judgment entered by the court below upon the award must be reversed.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Clark v. Clearfield Opera House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Gardner v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Conley v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Kerwin v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Yanik v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- McCall v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Flood v. Logan Iron & Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Shoop v. Chambersburg Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.