Legal Opinion

Emcasco Insurance v. Waymire

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1990No. 89-471PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

Defendant Dustin and Julia Waymire appeal the judgment of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, in a case involving a claim under a fire insurance policy. The District Court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Emcasco Insurance Company (Emcasco), relieving Emcasco from all obligations to pay the Waymires any amount under the policy of insurance, on the grounds that the Waymires concealed, misrepresented, or omitted material facts when applying for the policy and they intentionally caused the fire destroying the property. We affirm.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Britton v. Farmers Insurance GroupMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CumiskeyMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GirtonMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hier v. Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MarksMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Marry v. Missoula County Sheriff's DepartmentMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gilman v. BeckMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Smith v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Smith v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API