Legal Opinion

Townley v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1917No. 6 Div. 603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; J. J. Curtis, Judge. Bill in equity by the Corona Coal & Iron Company against M. D. Townley and others. From a decree for complainant, respondent Townley appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The primary object of the hill as amended was to sell for. division among joint owners the coal and mineral rights in the lands specifically described. As an incident to this relief, the bill sought the quieting of title as against the claims of certain parties respondent and the establishment of the extent of the complainant’s interest therein.

The averments of ownership made in the bill as last amended as to the respective interests of appellant, M. D. Townley, and appellee, Corona Coal & Iron Company, and the Birmingham Fuel Company, are:

“Complainant further alleges that it is the owner and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Betts v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. LollarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Townley v. Birmingham Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API