Legal Opinion

Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1919No. 6 Div. 878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Ex parte application for certiorari to the Court of Appeals in the case of the Birmingham Waterworks Company against A. M. Edwards.

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

Amended rule 42, reproduced on page vii, 77 South.,1 requires an application for certiorari to be accompanied by a brief “pointing out and arguing the point or decision sought to be revised and a certificate” to be attached to or embodied therein affirming that “a copy of said brief has been served on counsel” for the opposite party, if the adverse party was represented by counsel in the Court of Appeals. The petition for certiorari in the present instance is not accompanied by a brief in support thereof. Because of the failure to observe the stated rule, the petition for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Townley v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Gulf, M. O. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Krasner v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API