Commonwealth v. Fox
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
This appeal arises from denial in the court below of appellant’s motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, following his conviction after a non-jury trial of possession of a controlled substance1 and possession with intent to deliver.2 On appeal, appellant asserts that his right to a speedy trial was violated, that there was no probable cause to support his warrantless arrest, and that the suppression court erroneously restricted defense counsel’s cross-examination of the arresting officer.3 For the reasons set forth herein, we remand the ease to the court below.
We first…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IannaccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BonasorteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. OgborneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.