Legal Opinion

Estate of Latimer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

There is no doubt that the remainders which' the will provided for the heirs of Mr. and Mrs. Latimer were estates in expectancy which were contingent or defeasible. It is also undisputable that no proceedings were taken to determine the tax upon them either at the time when the tax upon the vested estates was determined or otherwise until aft er Mrs. Widney’s death. The calculation of the remainder by subtracting the value of the vested estates from the total estate for distribution, as the court did in the 1924 order, is not a proceeding for determination of the tax. It must also be conceded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salomon v. State Tax Comm'n of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. State v. MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mitchell v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Taxation v. ScherffiusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Department of Taxation v. ScherffiusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API