Legal Opinion

State v. Merrill

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The state contends that the inheritance taxes must be determined and imposed according to the statutes providing therefor, and that there is no authority in the statutes for postponing their determination and imposition.

The statutes of 1929 in force at the time of the testator’s death declare as follows: “A tax shall be and is hereby imposed upon any (every) transfer of property ... or income therefrom in trust or otherwise.” . . . Sec. 72.01. “Such tax shall be imposed when any . . . (legatee) becomes beneficially entitled, in possession or expectancy, to any property or the income thereof.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Estate of StephensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Kempsmith v. WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re the Estate of KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Miller v. TracyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Department of Taxation v. ScherffiusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Jahn's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Mitchell v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. First National Bank of Superior v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Estate of LatimerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API