Legal Opinion · Dissent

Footstar, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 2006No. S06G0125Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

The dispositive issue in this case is which insurer, Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) or Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual), is responsible for paying workers’ compensation income benefits to Felicia Stevens. In 1999, she was injured in the course of her employment with Footstar, Inc. (Footstar). At that time, Travelers was the workers’ compensation carrier for Footstar. Ms. Stevens did not quit working as the result of her injury, and she received only medical benefits from Travelers. In 2001, Liberty Mutual became Footstar’s workers’ compensation carrier. In January of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hart v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Blackwell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance v. BabyakCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Aldrich v. City of Lumber CitySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API