Legal Opinion
Niestat v. Equitable Security Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 11, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
6 N.J. Super. 148 (1950)
70 A.2d 529
HARRY NIESTAT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
EQUITABLE SECURITY COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, MEYER LOBSENZ, SIDNEY LOBSENZ, NATHAN P. LOBSENZ, TRUSTEE, R. LOMAURS & SONS, INC., AND THE CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 12, 1949.
Decided January 11, 1950.
Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.
Mr. Meyer Lobsenz argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Spitz & La Cava, attorneys).
Mr. Samuel A. Wiener argued the cause for the respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Slear v. JankiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Ansin v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Lennig v. Ocean City Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
- Coudert v. SayreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
- McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leasehold Estates, Inc. v. Fulbro Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Borough of Wildwood Crest v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Rossi v. SierchioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Yonadi v. Homestead Country HomesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Pochinski Realty Associates v. PuzioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991