Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Helsell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1911PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Clay District Court. — Hon. D. 3?. .Coyle, Judge. A proceeding to redeem from au execution salé, and to have a conveyance absolute in form decreed to be a mortgage only. Judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, O. J.

This is a special proceeding under section 4057 of the Code, brought by the plaintiff' to enforce her right to redeem certain land from a sale. under execution. The controlling question in the case is whether a deed absolute in form is, in fact, simply a mortgage. The facts are substantially as follows:

S. C. Bradford, husband of the plaintiff, owned an equity in a farm other than the one in controversy here. He had an opportunity to trade such equity for a stock of hardware and an equity in a store building, and to trade the stock and store building for an equity in the land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bigler v. JackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Hughes v. SheaffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Jones v. GillettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Krebs v. LauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Betts v. BettsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fort v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Rance v. GaddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Tansil v. McCumberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Sargent v. HamblinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Reusch v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API