Legal Opinion

Bigler v. Jack

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1901PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Shelby District Gourt. — Hon. A. B. Thor- ° NELL, Judge. Suit in equity to have a deed and contract for reconveyance declared a mortgage, for an accounting, and to redeem. The trial court denied the relief asked, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

1 Plaintiff was the owner of the land in controversy, subject to a mortgage of $3,000 to one Bicke, of Davenport, Iowa, and another of about $2,000 to defendant, Jack. Jack’s mortgage was long past due, and he (Jack) was insisting on payment of part or all there-of. Bigler was unable to pay, but he came to Harlan, where Jack resided, and offered to sell his land, consisting of 200 acres, to a third party for $25 per acre. Bailing in this, he went to Jack and offered to sell to him for $30. This Jack refused to pay, and, after some further talk, Bigler finally said to Jack that he would sell…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Conway's Executors & Devisees v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  3. Campbell v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Trucks v. LindseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Hughes v. SheaffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Keeline v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Davis v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. Rance v. GaddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API