Legal Opinion

Connor v. Coleman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 27, 1979No. 78-1013PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners are plaintiffs in a suit seeking reapportionment of the Mississippi Legislature. In the most recent of the Court’s decisions in this extended litigation, Connor v. Finch, 431 U. S. 407, 426 (1977), it reversed the judgment of the District Court and directed that court to draw a new reapportionment plan for the 1979 elections “with a compelling awareness of the need for its expeditious accomplishment.”

On remand, and after further proceedings, the parties developed a settlement plan. Negotiations broke down, however, over the wording of a consent decree. In the meantime, the State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Wise v. LipscombSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Connor v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zelma C. Wyche v. The Madison Parish Police JuryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Mississippi v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  3. Seamon v. UphamDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1982
  4. Connor v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. 19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 979, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9179 Thomas Lee Eichman v. Indiana State University Board of Trustees, David Rice, Donald Bennett, James Blivens, Robert Reid, Alan C. Rankin, James D. Acher, Rex Breeden, Charles W. Ainley, William L. Hitch, Herbert Lamb, Nancye T. Mitchell, and James T. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API