Legal Opinion
State v. Mertz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1964No. 39,218Published
1Opinion of the Court
269 Minn. 312 (1964)
130 N.W. (2d) 631
STATE
v.
DONALD N. MERTZ.[*]
No. 39,218.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
September 18, 1964.
Donald N. Mertz, pro se, for appellant.
Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General, Charles E. Houston, Solicitor General, George M. Scott, County Attorney, and Per M. Larson, First Assistant County Attorney, for respondent.
MURPHY, JUSTICE.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the district court and an order of said court denying his motion to vacate the judgment.[1]
On May 8, 1958, a complaint was filed in the municipal court of Minneapolis wherein defendant was charged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Bennett v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.