People v. Thomas
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, J., pro tem.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter committed in the city of Sacramento on the evening of December 21, 1921. It is charged in the information that he “willfully, unlawfully and feloniously” committed the act.
[1] The appellant insists that, as the offense was feloniously committed, it must therefore have been malicious. Since manslaughter is an unlawful killing without malice, he argues that the information does not charge that offense. But manslaughter is clearly a felony, and to charge that the crime was “felonious” is no more than to charge that it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. PearneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- People v. CowgillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. PociaskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. MarconiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- State v. SalhusIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. SellasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Gould v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.