Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 23, 2006No. Civil Action 03-1931 (PLF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This is a tort action in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for electric shock injuries he sustained while working on a new parking garage owned by the defendant in Montgomery County, Maryland. The matter is before the Court on two motions. The first is defendant’s motion to strike the ad damnum clause in the complaint to the extent that plaintiff seeks recovery in excess of $200,000. The second is defendant’s motion to amend the Joint Pretrial Statement, originally filed on December 16, 2005, to include two affirmative…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Weller v. Department Of Social Services For The City Of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. BriggsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Maxwell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Proctor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Hazel v. Prudential Financial, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024