Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Briggs
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell
In this appeal, we consider whether the limitation of liability in the Virginia Tort Claims Act, Code §§ 8.01-195.1, et seq., applies to a judgment entered against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Michael R. Briggs filed a motion for judgment against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) alleging that he was injured when a bus, operated by WMATA’s employee, collided with Briggs’ motorcycle. The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of Briggs in the amount of $90,000.
WMATA filed a post-trial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Proctor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Couplin v. PayneSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Jones v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Wilson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Commonwealth v. FoxFairfax County Circuit Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.