Legal Opinion

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 27, 1998No. Record 971020PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether the limitation of liability in the Virginia Tort Claims Act, Code §§ 8.01-195.1, et seq., applies to a judgment entered against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Michael R. Briggs filed a motion for judgment against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) alleging that he was injured when a bus, operated by WMATA’s employee, collided with Briggs’ motorcycle. The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of Briggs in the amount of $90,000.

WMATA filed a post-trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Couplin v. PayneSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Jones v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. Wilson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. FoxFairfax County Circuit Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API