Legal Opinion

State v. Tierney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 5, 1980No. 65-79PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaley, J.

After a trial by jury in district court, the defendant was convicted of being under actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2). Defendant’s sole claim of error on appeal is the denial of his motion to suppress the results of the breath test.

Section 1202(a) of Title 23 states in relevant part:

A sample of breath shall be taken only by a law enforcement officer who has been certified by the department of public safety to operate a field sample gathering device for the gas chromatograph intoximeter whenever a state police…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Audette v. GreerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  2. State v. MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  3. State v. MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. In re J. S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. State v. LundSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Rutland Herald v. Vermont State Police and Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. In Re Baptist Fellowship of Randolph, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API