Legal Opinion

Bell v. Ard

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 12, 1999No. 2970949Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C), Ala.R.App. P.; Rule 52(a), Ala.R.Civ.P.; Ex parte Patronas, 693 So.2d 473 (Ala.1997); Ex parte Bryowsky, 676 So.2d 1322 (Ala.1996); Satterfield v. Decker, 437 So.2d 506 (Ala. 1983); D.C. v. C.O., 721 So.2d 195 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998); Black v. Black, 625 So.2d 450 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); Scanlan v. Rowinsky, 611 So.2d 1092 (Ala.Civ.App.1992); and H.T. v. C.T.W., 569 So.2d 418 (Ala.Civ.App.1990).

YATES, MONROE, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. CRAWLEY, J., concurs in the result.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BryowskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte PatronasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. D.C. v. C.O.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. H.T. v. C.T.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Satterfield v. DeckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API