Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. Decker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1983No. 82-163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal comes from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County in favor of the plaintiff, Carl H. Decker. Decker sued W.S. Satterfield on a promissory note for $60,000.00. Satterfield answered, stating that he never received any money from Decker in consideration for the execution of the note, and did not owe Decker anything. After hearing the evidence without a jury, the court granted judgment for the plaintiff in the full amount of the note, plus 10% interest and 10% attorney's fee, as provided in the note. Satterfield then filed a motion for new trial, a motion for findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caudle v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Haynie v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Zirlott v. RadcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. CootsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Finley v. FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Bell v. ArdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Johnson v. CadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API