Legal Opinion
United States v. Padilla
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2011No. 09-10451PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed February 9, 2011, slip op. 2455, and appearing at 633 F.3d 1177, is amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 2461, at the end of the first full paragraph under the subheading analysis, insert the following as a footnote: “If the defendant requests a Carter instruction and the district court declines to give the instruction, our review is typically de novo. See United States v. Lopez, 477 F.3d 1110, 1113 (9th Cir.2007). The circumstances here are somewhat different because the court did give an adequate instruction at the outset of the trial and now Padilla objects to the court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. TurriettaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Lorenzo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Hammonds v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- United States v. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.