Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Duke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1992No. 6-91-105-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Maryland Casualty’s appeal in this workers’ compensation case questions the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s findings that Crystal Duke was totally and permanently disabled on April 1, 1989. Maryland also contends that the award improperly included benefits beyond 401 weeks from the date of her injury. We find that the evidence is sufficient to support the award, but agree that the award covered an improper interval.

Duke slipped and fell while working part-time as a waitress at the Pizza Hut in Bonham. She was treated briefly…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cigna Ins. Co. of Texas v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. SECOND INJURY FUND OF STATE v. Avon, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API