Legal Opinion
Tate v. Hoover
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 13, 1942No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from a decree ordering the appellant to “surrender and cancel” a deed for certain premises in West Pittston, Luzerne County. The title to these premises were adjudged to be vested in O. M. Tate, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy for the creditors of Post and Company, a co-partnership. (This title was subject to a lease of the Socony-Vaeuum Oil Company).
The proceedings were begun by a bill in equity filed by the Trustee in Bankruptcy of Post and Company, alleging that the deed of Martha L. Post (allegedly one of the co-partners of Post and Company), dated…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Voest-Alpine Trading USA Corp. v. Vantage Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
- Central Pennsylvania Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Buffalo Refrigerating Mach. Co. v. Penn Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Traeger v. Sapir (In Re Danenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.