Horowitz v. Horowitz

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff Israel Horowitz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), dated February 5, 1988, as denied his cross motion to disqualify the defendant’s counsel and his law firm, and which directed that the plaintiff pay for the transcript of his own deposition.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which denied the cross motion, and substituting therefor a provision granting the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as…