Legal Opinion

In re Winston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding for the construction of a will, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Brewster, S.), dated December 11, 1990, which granted the respondent Ronald Winston’s motion to disqualify the law firm representing the petitioner.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant.

The disqualification of the law firm representing the petitioner was proper since an attorney must avoid not only the fact, but also the appearance of representing conflicting interests (see, Horowitz v Horowitz, 151 AD2d 646). Thompson, J. P.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horowitz v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API