Stomel v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
927 A.2d 129 (2007)
192 N.J. 137
Elliot S. STOMEL, Plaintiff-Respondent and Cross-Appellant,
v.
The CITY OF CAMDEN, Gwendolyn Faison and The Camden City Council, Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Respondents, and
Mayor Milton Milan and John Doe(s) 1-10, individually, jointly and/or in the alternative, Defendants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 4, 2007.
Decided July 25, 2007.
John C. Eastlack, Jr., Woodbury, argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Holston, MacDonald, Uzdavinis, Eastlack, Ziegler & Lodge, attorneys; Cheryl L. Cooper, on the briefs).
Alan H. Schorr, Cherry Hill,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIA; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.