Legal Opinion

Neal v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit instituted by appellant against appellee to recover damages alleged to have accrued by reason of personal injuries inflicted on appellant while attempting to board a passenger train at Kingsbury, Texas. Trial was had by jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee.

The following assignments of error are grouped in the brief:

“First assignment of error: The court erred in giving special requested charge number 4 by defendant, as follows: ‘Plaintiff alleges in his petition that defendant company refused to check said parcels as baggage by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Everett & LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Phœnix Furniture Co. of Port Arthur v. KayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. United Producers' Pipe Line Co. v. Lantry-Fike Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Masterson v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Palm v. TheumannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API