Legal Opinion

Coman v. Williams

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1954No. 7340PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMSON, Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover from the defendant $700 damages for fraud and deceit. In his complaint he claims that the defendant, on July 25, 1950, intending to deceive the plaintiff and to induce him to purchase four fur coats, falsely represented to the plaintiff that said “four fur coats were genuine mink, muskrat, beaver and other valuable furs;” that the defendant knew that such representations were false; that in truth and in fact said fur coats were only rabbit coats made to look like the coats which the defendant represented them to be. Plaintiff alleges…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Agrest v. AgrestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Coman v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Warne v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ziegler v. Ford Motor Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Carl v. Granger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Verry v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Laber v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Buehner v. HoevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. L. J. Hablas v. Armour and Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  5. Leach v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API