Legal Opinion

Marra v. Stocker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1992No. 61 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This appeal involves the question of whether a default of the due-on-sale clause of a mortgage agreement by the residential mortgage debtor excuses compliance with the notice and cure *189provisions of Act 6 of 19741 by the residential mortgage lender.

The facts of the case are as follows. A mortgage in the amount of $49,000 for property at 704 Mauch Chunk Street, Easton, Northampton County, Pennsylvania, was executed between Appellee, Merchants Bank (the Bank) and Appellees, Robert and Marie Apgar (the Apgars) on November 11, 1982. On June 3, 1985, the Bank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth Tr. Co. of Pbg. v. HarkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Churches v. GoldsworthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Fidelity Bank v. PiersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Doherty v. Adal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Empire Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. VukmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Soto v. PNC Bank (In Re Soto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. First Eastern Bank, N.A. v. Campstead, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. In Re TownsvilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API